SamplesDescriptionDebate IssuesBuy essay
← Comprehending ArchitectureCreative Works →

Free Example of Debate Issues Essay

In the past, scholars have been arguing whether there is true history or not. According to the proponents, there is true history because historians can never wake up from anywhere and start writing about history without facts. Secondly, the method of gathering evidence historians apply is the scientific method ( 2012). This method collects true data of the past by eliminating any factual evidence that is not true ( 2012). For this reason, the writing of history by historians is based on factual evidence collected. Therefore, based on these facts, there is true history.

On the other hand, opponents to the argument base compelling facts stating that there is nothing like true history. First, they state that nobody can ever write what happened from event to event or word to word in history even if it happened yesterday. Secondly, writers of history or historians are extremely biased when writing history. In the past, renowned historians are facing prejudice because of writing history without facts ( 2012). When the historians lack facts about a certain event in history, they use their own judgment to conclude the topic. The main problem is that this judgment is biased because it is not written from factual evidence. For this reason, there is nothing like true history.

Type of assignment
Writer level
Title of your paper
Total price

Another contentious argument is whether there is objective history. According to professionals, history is supposed to be objective for purposes of teaching people lessons so that they cannot repeat the same mistakes. However, scholars have been arguing that there is no objective history. This is because historians are writing history for purposes of knowledge. In this case, historians are not providing any objectivity for the readers of history. Finally, in many occasion there are instances where two historians conflict themselves when they are writing the same event ( 2012). Therefore, this shows that presently there is no objectivity in history.

When a scholar is writing history, he or she will write some information intelligently by convincing readers about what was happening in the past. In most cases, when they are doing this they do not have enough evidence or facts about the past. For this reason, they have to write something that will attract their readers and convince them ( 2012). This presentation by historians is called mythistory. Therefore, mythistory is described as the process whereby historians intelligently convince their readers about an event in the past without the use of factual evidence ( 2012).

Is it essential for historians to be on the right page about an event that was happening in the past? In order to answer this question, certain facts have to be analyzed. First, when historians have different perceptions about a certain fact in history, it can be hard for readers to believe either of them. This is because in most case historians tend to convince their readers that they are using facts to write this history. In this case, readers will be confused to identify the historian who is telling the truth ( 2012). As a result, they will tend to disbelief anything the two historians are saying. For this reason, it is extremely critical that the two historians have the same perception to convince readers about the event.

In Salem, there was an association of women with witchcraft. In this case, Karlsen gave a compelling argument that puritans were viewing women negatively at this time. As a result, they were associating women with witchcraft (Madaras & SoRelle, 2008). On the other hand, Carlson argues that people tend not to take into account physical evidence that was occurring in Salem. Therefore, witchcraft was associated with women because of the physical and neurological behavior resulting from unrecognized epidemic of encephalitis (Madaras & SoRelle, 2008).

Code: writers15

Related essays

  1. Creative Works
  2. Web 2.0 and Web 1.0
  3. Comprehending Architecture
  4. 'Terra Fluxus'
View all