SamplesDescriptionDisagreementBuy essay
← Martin Luther King Day Internet Mental Health Issues →

Free Example of Disagreement Essay


The vast fields of Natural and Human sciences are a result of several individuals’ effort towards digging up sources that have not been explored before. This is just the genesis of the development and building of the body of knowledge (Carnabuci 48). There are many ways and means that shape and fine tune the body of knowledge. Among these means, we have the use of disagreements as a mode of shaping the way people perceive the knowledge passing along or shaping the reasoning of the people (Popper 15). Although several people argue that disagreements are hindrances to the growth of knowledge, it is imperative for all seekers of knowledge to understand that disagreements play the most vital role in building the body of knowledge.

Type of assignment
Writer level
Title of your paper
Total price

Disagreements have a significant role in the way people perceive arguments proposed in the fields of human and natural sciences (Goldstein, 55). How would knowledge be, if no one disputed the propositions of the agile science inventors? Is there a possibility that the whole world population would still be seeing the earth as a flat surface? These are the many questions that remain unanswered in the minds of scholars who consider disagreements as having formed the basis of knowledge. Disagreement evokes diverse modes of thinking with a desire to prove that the ideas on the table can be seen from a different angle (Carnabuci 63). A single sided form of thinking results in stereotypical knowledge. The converse of the former statement is the use of diverse sources that perfectly illuminate all facets of the body of knowledge. This results in an all rounded body of knowledge (Sajja and Akerkar 50).

People’s perceptions are a result of gradual forces of convincing that arise from the presentation of formal and organized arguments (Goldstein 72). With these in place, the audience of a given debate about a contentious issue of human or natural science sees another new angle to the argument. Scholars and inventors present new facts and findings together with newer forms of understanding (Sajja and Akerkar 48). People gradually accept and adopt concepts and ideas that faced resistance from several quarters of the academics. A common example concerns the perception that the world surface is oval. The idea that the population then believed was that, the earth’s surface was flat. A new and disagreeing argument could not take place within the minds of the people. In order to alleviate the then current thinking from the body of scientists, scholars presented clear and logical disagreement statements (Popper 106). With logical thinking, the result was a global adoption of the oval nature of the globe.

Other common areas of knowledge that required a hard twist of the arm of the conventional thinking involved the ideas behind different kinds of sicknesses (Popper 102). To a great extent, people thought that sicknesses and diseases were punishments from the forces of nature. A strong fear gripped the population whenever a disease broke out. With the advent of the contemporary medical practice, most people shunned away from the use of medical drugs. In order to change the negative perception towards contemporary medicine, the medical fraternity had to present its side of the argument (Sajja & Akerkar 47). This involved tight grip on facts and logical points that clearly differed with the thinking at the time.

A key contributor to the body of knowledge lies at the heart of a reason (Popper 169). The main question that reason seeks to address is; why do things happen the way they do? A stereotypical society finds sumptuous comfort in believing in one sided forms of reasoning (Goldstein, 95). To such a society there is absolute knowledge that cannot be challenged. The building of the body of knowledge demands that opposition must arise in the face of conventional modes of thinking (Carnabuci 38). Frequent challenges to the conventional reasoning evoke new ideas in the people, hence the birth of new knowledge (Sajja and Akerkar 50).

Code: writers15

Related essays

  1. Internet Mental Health Issues
  2. Domestic and International Programs
  3. Martin Luther King Day
  4. Appearances verse Reality
View all