← Slavery during the Renaissance | The Industrial Revolution → |
Free Example of Enlightenment and Revolution Essay
During the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, there were many different attitudes toward the institution of slavery. The resolution of slavery undoubtedly influenced on politics, economics and social life. The slave trade relationship between Europe, west Africa, and the Indies has a great affect on European economics during this period. Without slaves the landowners in the new world were not able to produce the sugar, coffee, and tobacco for export to Europe. African slaves were strong, because they were used to working in the hot conditions of the Indies, as long as they had originally came from a very hot climate in Africa. The issue of slavery did have a great impact on the French politics during the Enlightenment and the revolution. The Declaration of the Rights of Man, issued by the National Assembly during the French Revolution declared the equality of all men. Arguments were raised concerning the use of this statement in the French colonies in the West Indies, which used slaves to work on the land as was mentioned above. As they had different interests, the philosophers, slave owners, and political leaders had different thoughts as to the universal equality. Many of the philosophers, the leaders of the Enlightenment, were against slavery. They claimed that all people had a natural dignity that should be recognized. Diderot, for instance, brought up the fact that the Christian religion was fundamentally opposed to Black slavery, but employed it anyway in order to work the plantations that financed their countries. “ Philosophers influenced by the ideals of the Enlightenment like equality, liberty, the right to dignity, tended to oppose the idea of slavery. On the other hand the political leaders and property owners considered slavery as an element that supported the economy. “ (Walvin, 1992) These people believed that if slavery and the slave trade were to be abolished, the French would lose their colonies, commerce would go down and as a result the merchant marine, agriculture and the arts would decline.
One of the most significant manifestations of the Enlightenment was the antislavery movement in England. Slavery was prohibited within the country in 1774. Beginning from 1807, a determined movement fought for abolition of the slave trade. It was led by William Wilberforce (1759-1833), Hannah Moore and other Anglican Evangelicals, along with many Methodists and Quakers. Wilberforce steadily introduced bills into the House of Commons that would have diminished the slave trade. His efforts were rewarded in 1807 when the trade was ended, although he and his companions had to continue to struggle for twenty-six more years, before they could achieve abolition in the British colonies. By 1783, antislavery movement has spread among the British public. The Quakers founded first English abolitionist organization and continued their influence on the movement. In 1787, the Committee for the Abolition of the Slave Trade was formed, referring to the Abolition of the Atlantic slave trade. There were many people who were fighting the slave trade : some African, some European by descent. “ Wilberforce and the Clapham Group were fighting for abolition, but their efforts were not in vain: the ‘Abolition of the Slave Trade Act’ passed by the British Parliament on 25 March 1807 and the slavery Abolition Act on 23 August 1833.”( Blackburn, 1997) It had to diminish slave trade, but despite the fine many ships continued their trade.
In the Age of Enlightenment, slavery could not co-exist with the new concept of equality, supported as well by the American, French and the Bolshevik revolutions. The idea of the working class being equal to the upper class was an idea that the working class endorsed, and considering the working class a majority of the population, it was the decision of the majority. “ With the addition of working class representatives in British parliament, labor laws were soon enforced. Britain's position of a colonial superpower influenced smaller countries' view on the issue.”