SamplesReviewMedia Thread PostBuy essay
← New Trends in Hotel Room ServiceThe Gospel →

Free Example of Media Thread Post Essay

Some articles published in newspapers, especially in not professional sources, sometimes present incomplete data or do not necessarily reflect the accurate information obtained from relevant sources. Thus, the main aim of this paper is to analyze an individually chosen article connected to health care issues and its accuracy based on the further study of the original research report.

“Strawberries, Blueberries Ward off Heart Disease in Women: Study”

Type of assignment
Writer level
Title of your paper
Total price

The article from Los Angeles Times, which was chosen for this task, focuses on analyzing the research recently conducted by a group of scientists. The results of the study have shown an inverse correlation between the amount of strawberries and blueberries women consumed and the risk of developing a heart related disease they had. Even after taking into account other factors (age, eating, drinking, and smoking habits, general health conditions, etc.), the results of the study were still relevant. The benefit of consuming these berries for younger women was proved to be due to the high level of anthocyanins present in them; anthocyanins prevent some processes in arteries that lead to atherosclerosis. The author provides the exact figure of how the risk of suffering from early heart attack was reduced. Hence, the risk of developing a heart related disease for women who were having three and more servings of strawberries and blueberries per week during continuous period of time declined by 32%. 

Correspondence of the article from Los Angeles Times to the scientific research conducted by the American Heart Association

The article by Healy (2013) is based on the results of the detailed scientific research published by the American Heart Association (2013). Thus, in order to check the accuracy of the media report, the information from the American Heart Association scientific report has been reviewed. Thus, the comparison of the information from the two sources has illustrated that the main ideas and the description of the research are accurate in the article since they correspond to the ones presented in the scientific research. In addition, the statistics provided by the author in Los Angeles Times regarding the amount of people who were tested, those of them who had heart attacks, etc. are accurate. However, some slight discrepancies are present between the news report and the research article. First of all, in the article, the author did not mention that the research was conducted on women because they have higher risks of developing a heart disease than men. Thus, it makes it not very straight forward why the research was made only on women.

Moreover, the article presents a very short summary of the main results of the research; it does not include full information about the way the research was held that can be found in the scientific research.

Furthermore, Healey presented the information in the way that assumed that the benefit of increasing the intake of anthocyanins was discovered only for younger- or middle-aged women, although the scientific research proves that older women can also benefit from including more anthocyanins in their diets. Thus, a decrease of the risk to develop heart related diseases by 18% and 9% was proved for women of older age groups.  

The author correctly noticed that the decrease of the risk of having a heart attack is not connected to the high intake of fruits and vegetables. However, she focused on blueberries and strawberries forgetting that there are other foods that are rich in anthocyanins (Healy, 2013). In the scientific research, the authors mention that high levels of anthocyanins are also present in red and blue fruits and vegetables, such as eggplants, blackberries, blueberries, strawberries, blackcurrants, and also onions.

Another factor is that the author failed to explain more about non-dietary factors of risk for women’s heart health in the article. She mentioned that the benefit of the anthocyanins remained sufficiently strong even after taking into account other risk factors not connected to the diet. In fact, the research shows that the women who never smoked, did not drink alcohol and did not have diabetes mellitus combined with high anthocyanins intake had even lower risk of developing heart diseases, so the results prevailed the average results.

Moreover, the American Heart Association mentions in the research that for every 15-mg rise in consumption of anthocyanins the risk of developing a heart disease declines by 17%. Healy did not state this fact limiting her explanation to only stating that three or above servings of strawberries and blueberries a week help to decrease the risk of having a heart disease by 32%. Another important fact is connected to the scientists arguing the existence of a threshold for anthocyanins intake making them not bioactive in small amount; it was not mentioned in the article written by Healy.

Finally, when the author stated that the consumption of three or more servings of strawberries and blueberries a week results in decreasing the risk of heart problems by 32%, she overestimated the matter. The research of the American Heart Association uses this figure to show the greatest risk reduction observed during the research. 


Overall, the media report addresses the topic in a truthful manner with main information matching with the scientific research. However, there are few issues connected to the media report missing important details and misinterpreting some points of the research results.

Code: writers15

Related essays

  1. The Gospel
  2. Where to Go When: The Americas
  3. New Trends in Hotel Room Service
  4. Twitter, Blogging and Journalism
View all