SamplesReviewThe Complete GoalBuy essay
← Natural EnvironmentThe Nursing Burnout →

Free Example of The Complete Goal Essay

Architecture is one of the disciplines experiencing tremendous growth over the last few decades. In architecture, creativity is a requirement especially in the current environment. However, due to evolution of technology, architecture has not be left behind in its application. In this case, architects are applying programming to create or design while they are working. As a result, it is becoming possible for the architects have the ability to see fine details of shapes and lengths they were traditionally overlooking in the past. For this reason, based on the knowledge of architecture, it is important to analyze the evolution of thought as it relates to programming.

In creativity, people have to think hard on what they are designing in order to come up with a unique product. In this case, architects have to think had when they are designing a building for purposes of emerging as unique professionals. On the other hand, they have to embrace modernity in their thought process so that they cannot create an outdated design. In addition, architects are not supposed to duplicate another person’s work. Therefore, they have to put all this information in their thought process while they are designing new buildings. It can be noted that the thought process by architects has always been an essential part of creativity in architecture.

In general, people say that technology kills creativity because it almost does all the work for the people. This means that it is likely to kill creativity in architecture. For this reason, due to the usage of programming in architecture, people believe that it is likely to affect the thought process of architects as they are designing new buildings. On the contrary, programming in architecture is changing how architects think. This is because when tradition buildings are compared to the modern buildings, it is clear that how the traditional architects were thinking is different from what the modern architects are thinking.

In the past, when architects were designing a building, their line of thought was considering the principle of composition. This means that they were applying feelings on their designs. This is where the result had a certain feeling or it was perceived to have a certain feeling. According to Vidler, many architects especially the modern architects are forgetting this essential principle due to the application of programming while designing. He continues to say that traditional architects were thinking of how people will perceive their designs. Additionally, they were considering the feeling their designs were going to portray to the people. However, due to the use of programming in architecture, the thought process is changing. Architects are slowly forgetting about the principle of composition. Therefore, this shows that there is evolution of thought in the discipline of architecture.

Programming is changing the thought process in architecture. This is because in the past it was extremely difficult for architects to show case three dimensions in designs. In this case, there thoughts were different while designing buildings. This is because they had to design in away to show the relevant parties all the sides of the product once it is built. Presently, architects have to think of how they are going to design all the sides of the building on one diagram. This is because of the availability of programming that has made it possible for three dimension programs. Therefore, according to John Corner, it is clear that the line of thought applied by traditional architects has evolved to the current line of thought applied by modern architects.

Kipnis currently accepts that the way people are thinking is evolving due to the current use of technology. He states that current architects are thinking of how they are going to bring modernism in their designs to be in line with the current environment. All this is being made possible by the use of programming in architecture. On the other hand, he states that duplication is becoming more common while using programming in comparison to traditional architectural work. This shows that there is evolution of thought in relation to the usage of programming. Many perceive this as negative evolution. As a result, architects are facing a lot of criticism while they are designing new modern buildings. For example, Mies Rohe designed glass curtains in his designs. In his line of though, he has been facing many criticism from people and yet other architects are duplicating his work. Therefore, this shows that there is evolution of thought in relation to the use programming in architecture.

According to Andrea Kahn, there is relationship between traditional and modern lines of thought as different entities. He states that the difference in these two entities is clear by the use of space on movement while designing the buildings. In addition, he states that the application of programming in architecture is separating these two entities in the way people are thinking. In this case, Kahn is urging people to compare traditional buildings and modern buildings. In traditional buildings, there is no movement or utilization of space. This shows the line of thought architects were using. On the other hand, the modern buildings have a lot of movement and application of space. This proves that the two entities are different in their line of thought where modern architecture is evolving from traditional architecture due to the application of programming.

In the book, ‘Architecture and Freedom’ by Kim Dovey and Scott Dickson, it states that there is evolution of thought in relation to programming in architecture. In the past, architects were not applying their freedom in the thought process. As a result, they were disregarding many concepts while they designing buildings. The authors have stated that current architects have freedom while they are designing new buildings. This is because they are able to apply many concepts in their work. An excellent example to show case the evolution of though in relation to programming is in Koohlas work. According to the authors, Koohlas application of programming in architecture is making it possible to exercise his freedom. In the end, he is line of thinking is creating buildings that blend with the type of social function of the project. Therefore, it is clear that there is evolution of thought in relation to programming in architecture.

Programming is making it possible for organic architecture in the modern world. In the past, architects were not blending their work with nature. In this case, they were concentrating more on how they are going to design a building to suit its uses. This shows that their line of thought only concentrated on the object and not the whole environment. However, as time is passing, architects are changing the way in which they think. In this case, programming is making it possible for them to apply organic culture. In this case, they are applying program to create a design that blends with nature. This is where the figure drawn depicts the true form of the location together with the new building. Therefore, programming is changing the way architects are thinking from the past.

According to ‘Artificial Heart’ by Stadler, he states that currently architects are having an easy time in bending their designs with nature. Stadler states that application of programming in architecture is making it possible for the architects to blend their designs with nature. Moreover, in the past, architects were not thinking of how they are going to blend their designs with the nature. Instead, they were thinking of how they are going to produce a magnificent and unique design. This is because they did not have resources to aid their thinking or creative skills. However, with the introduction programming in architecture, architects are changing their thought process. As a result, they are able to create designs that blend with nature.

Finally, programming is creating reality in the designs architects are designing. In the past, architects were not drawing buildings that were embracing reality. This is because they did not have resources. As a result, they had a different line of thought. However, after embracing programming in architecture, the line of thought started to evolve. In this case, architects were trying to improve their designs by looking at intricate details search as size, shape and environmental compatibility of the building. This is where architects started thinking of they are going to bring reality to the designs. Therefore, this shows that evolution in thought in relation to the programming in architecture.

Conclusion

According to the above analysis, there is immense evolution of thought in relation to programming in architecture. In the past, architects did not apply programming. Therefore, they had separate way of thinking. However, after application of programming, there was evolution of thought. First, architects started to neglect the principle of composition and at the same time, they started duplicating work. Secondly, they started to think of modernism. Thirdly, architects stated to think of organic architecture creating reality in their designs. Therefore, this shows that there is immense growth in evolution of thought in relation to programming to architecture.

Code: Sample20

Related essays

  1. The Nursing Burnout
  2. Elements of a Contract
  3. Natural Environment
  4. Architectural Response Paper
Testimonials
View all
call-back-button
Live chat