Type: Analysis
Pages: 6 | Words: 1774
Reading Time: 8 Minutes

Death as a form of punishment has been of interest to various stakeholders namely: The international community, human rights defenders, and Governments of various States mainly because, it touches on three basic norms and human rights; namely the right to life, the prohibition of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment, and the concept of human dignity.  However, despite death as a punishment being associated with violation of basic human rights, such as life and human dignity, a report by the Death Penalty Information Center indicates that 33 of the 50 States in the United States have not abolished the death penalty. Methods of execution are still in practice such as lethal injection, electrocution, gas chambers, hanging, and firing squad.                                                                                                                          

Historical Background on Death as a Penalty for Crimes the United States

The English colonist introduced the death penalty, to the United States. He imported their laws into America for Crimes considered grave crimes in England. These crimes include but are not limited to Murder, theft, rape, Manslaughter, arson and robbery with violence. Over 20000 executions since the death penalty in the United States were introduced have been implemented. It is fascinating to note that despite campaigns and international legislation on the abolition of the death penalty, the failure of the criminal justice system of the United States. The United States has specifically placed the reservation on such legislation, such as article 6 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, which encourages the abolition of the death penalty by delivering wrongful convictions. Further, to appreciate the complexity of the law that governs the right to life in the United States, it is essential to note the lack of uniformity in the law. This is inclusive of the variation on the death penalty issue in the different US states.

Land Mark Cases in the Jurisprudence of Death Penalty in the United States

By the year 1960, 40 of the 50 States in America had legislated authorizing the death penalty. However, it was not until 1972 when the Supreme Court of the United States, in the Case of Furman V Georgia, a landmark case in the death penalty jurisprudence of the United States, overturned a decision of the Supreme Court. Hence abolished the death penalty.

The Court in this case relied on the absence of a uniform moratorium, and clear guidelines directing the jury on either imprisonment or execution, which resulted to arbitrariness and discriminatory sentencing. The Supreme Court in Furman v Georgia held the death penalty to be unconstitutional and found that it violated the eighth and the fourteenth amendments which are opposed to punishments that are unusual and cruel (1972). The State of Georgia and other states revised their statutes, and as a result, death as a penalty was reinstated through the landmark case of Gregg v Georgia which upheld the Constitutionality of the Death Penalty applied under the revised statutes. In this high-profile case, the appellant argued that the imposition of the death penalty violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held that although the legislature may not impose excessive punishment pursuant to the Eighth Amendment, it is not required to select possibly the least severe penalty. The Supreme Court further held that possibility and the retribution of capital are not considerations that are impermissible, which a legislature should weigh and determine whether there should be an implementation of the death sentence.

Another landmark decision delivered by the United States Supreme Court was in the case of Trop v. Dulles were Brennan, J in concurring with the majority, emphasized the deterrent end of punishment by stating that ‘Rehabilitation is a major purpose of the penal law. Other purposes include the deterrents of the wrongful act. This is by the threat of punishment and insulation of dangerous individuals from society by imprisonment or execution.

The three cases serve to indicate the position of the United States as a pro-death penalty state and efforts to abolish it, as the cases discussed earlier, such as that of Furman v Georgia have overturned this.

The Irreversibility of Death Penalty in Case of a Mistrial

Chris Patten has written on “the inhumane, unnecessary and Irreversible Character of Capital Punishment”. He opposes the death penalty since it is cruel and unwarranted due to its irreversible nature and the risk of applying the punishment in error (European Commissioner for External Relations).  In support, if this argument, Gerald Kogan stated that:

“My mind has no question, and I can pronounce that I have seen the extents of the criminal judicial, systems over the years. I have acted as a prosecutor; trial judge, defense attorney; and Supreme Court Justice. That shows me that we certainly have executed those people either who did not fit in the criteria for execution in Florida or who, factually, was not guilty of the crime for which they were charged.

The Bill of rights of the United States Constitution provides the presumption of innocent until proven guilty, the right to legal representation and the right to a free and fair trial. Briefly, the bill of rights assures the United States’ citizens of the right to a due process of the law (Saundra Westervelt, 11). Despite this assurance, there has been documentation of numerous cases on wrongful convictions and indeed several of these convictions are punishable by death. In their book Wrongful Conviction, they have stated that, in the early 1990s, reports on 400 cases viewed them as wrongful conviction, 23 executions of the four hundred convicted were reported, while other had spent several years in prison.

The aforesaid may go towards justifying an argument put forward that the death penalty is cruel and degrading and goes against the International Convention on Torture, Cruel, Inhumane and degrading punishment on the account that it causes death row syndrome’. The circumstances existing on death row and physical deterioration of prisoners serving death sentence and awaiting their execution receive its description using the Row syndrome.  (Hanowsky et al, 10). This phenomenon is an effect of the callous conditions that an inmate experiences while, on death row, the duration that such conditions is experienced, and the anxiety of awaiting one’s own execution. The syndrome relates to the prolonged periods on death row, which amounts to cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment. Other Scholars have accredited the Death Row Syndrome to the stress associated with death sentences.

This can be evidence by injustice in the case of Carter v Rafferty. In this case, Carter was incarcerated for a period of nineteen years. This was because he received allegations of murder, something that he did not do. After 19 years of imprisonment, he was released (Saundra Westervelt et al. 25).  The experience of an innocent person undergoes in prison before execution amounts to the so-referred death syndrome and this is a clear violation one freedom from torture and inhumane and degrading treatment.

Notably, the United States Constitution and the Criminal Justice system’s structure is in a way that reassures that only the only people convicted in the above cases are the guilty. However, in the above cases, this is not true. The intentional and non-intentional mistakes of the law enforcers has not protected the innocent. It is evident from the various wrongful convictions, which convey that Constitutional safeguards are sometimes inadequate to protect the innocent. This is due intentional mistakes of the law enforcers such as in the case of Kerry Cook v the State of Texas.  The court noted that the prosecution had interfered with the evidence and hence the conviction was obtained on flawed evidence is a clear example. While, on the other hand, unintentional mistakes may occur resulting to wrongful conviction and consequently execution in case of death sentences.

Saundra Westervelt in her book notes various factors that have been reported to lead to wrongful; convictions of innocent people. These factors include; “Police mistakes; identification; false confessions; unreliable informants; mistaken eyewitness, and flawed forensic science”. Police focus on suspects prematurely ignoring evidence that does not support their case, coerce false confession, conduct and administer biased lineups. They also focus on culturally or racially marginal groups withholding exculpatory evidence from prosecutors”.

In support to the aforementioned, in September 1999, an officer who was awaiting retrial on charges of stealing cocaine made a deal with the prosecutor in exchange of information on crimes committed by other officers in the Community Resource Against Street Hoodlums in  Los Angeles Police department who in turn fabricated evidence that pointed to innocent suspects. In his confession, Officer Perez stated that officers often lied in arrest reports of killing but, on the other hand, accused innocent bystanders (Samuel, 533-4). At least a hundred criminal defendants were exonerated but not to forget hundreds of others had been dismissed by the Judges and the Jury and subsequently executed on crimes they did not commit.

In Response, scholars and the International Organization fighting for the abolition of the death penalty argue that by executing those sentenced to death, it does not deter more than a sentence of life imprisonment would show. As Nolasco Kubasu, a philosopher and conflict management specialist says that the death sentence is barbaric and advocates for its abolishment. Kubasu argues that courts should give correctional sentences to convicts. He further maintains, “The State, in taking the high moral ground, should correct wrongs by passing life sentence where it deems fit and not killing”. Kubasu also notes that the State destroys another life, by creating bitterness and not remorsefulness when it takes away life of a convict and more so of an innocent convict.

Persons exonerated having been sentenced to death is on the increase in the United States and this only proves that the Criminal justice system and the Constitution of the United States are not sufficient to protect innocent person from execution from innocent or intentional mistakes of the law enforcers. It is therefore prudent that the criminal system of each State goes through a revision on issues such as informants and eye witnessing identification.  Police officers conspiracy and tampering with evidence to get a conviction, is a matter that should be checked upon. In the United States, the federal and the National States that still uphold the death penalty issue, may consider its abolition, but place a reservation for notorious crimes such as terrorism, leaving no room for arbitrariness.

Copy-pasting equals plagiarizing!

Mind that anyone can use our samples, which may result in plagiarism. Want to maintain academic integrity? Order a tailored paper from our experts.

Get my custom paper
3 hours
the shortest deadline
original, no AI
300 words
1 page = 300 words
This is a sample essay that should not be submitted as an actual assignment
Need an essay with no plagiarism?
Grab your 15% discount
with code: writers15
Related essays
1 (888) 456 - 4855